Review Article

Hitchhikers’ guide to the legal context of protected area management plans in South Africa

Magda Goosen, Andrew C. Blackmore
Bothalia | Vol 49, No 1 | a2399 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v49i1.2399 | © 2019 Magda goosen | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 19 July 2018 | Published: 08 January 2019

About the author(s)

Magda Goosen, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, South Africa
Andrew C. Blackmore, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa; and, School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa


See Updates


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Background: Although formal protected areas in South Africa date back to the turn of the 19th century, requirements for protected area management plans only became mandatory a century later. Prior to the promulgation of the World Heritage Convention Act 49 in 1999, and subsequently the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 57 in 2003, requirements for management plans were voluntary, and guidance to the plan’s content was fragmented across an array of international, national and provincial policy instruments.

Objectives: As there has been little academic debate on the relevance and content of protected area management plans, an improved understanding of these plans, and the role they play in biodiversity conservation, is required.

Method: This article explores the evolution of the management plan, revisiting its historical and current legal context at international and national scales.

Results: Despite being the principal legislative framework for management plans, the World Heritage Convention Act and the National Environmental Management Protected Area Act did not consolidate the plethora of management plan requirements, and hence did not bring clarity when these conflicted or were ambiguous.

Conclusion: Legal provisions for management plans are highly fragmented. This risks plans not being complete, falling short of the requirement to ensure that protected areas fulfil the purpose for which they were established. A consolidation of relevant provisions, as well as emerging best practices is recommended. This may require the revision of South Africa’s environmental law, to provide greater clarity on the contemporary understanding of the contribution of protected areas to conservation and the well-being of people (viz. the ‘purpose’).


Keywords

biodiversity; conservation; legal requirements; protected area plans; management authorities; management; multilateral environmental agreements; protected area; public trust doctrine

Metrics

Total abstract views: 134
Total article views: 178


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.