To be or not to be a protected area: A perverse political threat




politics, decision-making, law, protected area, threat, Court Case, Mabola Protected Environment, public trust principle, precautionary principle, governance, impact assessment, environment, mining, sensitive biodiversity


Background: On 15 January 2021, a South African Member of the Executive Committee (MEC) for the Environment amended the Mabola Protected Environment’s (MPE) boundaries to remove legal impediments preventing coal mining in this protected area. This decision came in the wake of the MPE being declared a protected area and a series of court cases ending at the Constitutional Court.
Objective: The objectives of this paper were: (1) evaluate the potential consequences of the MEC’s decision for South African protected areas; (2) speculate on the possible impact on South Africa’s reputation in terms of its commitment to safeguarding its protected areas; (3) identify possible weaknesses in the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 57 of 2003 (NEMPAA); and (4) make recommendations to strengthen this Act so that it can reduce the vulnerability of protected areas to arbitrary and prejudicial decision-making.
Methods: This study involved an evaluation of NEMPAA and the notice in the Provincial Gazette declaring and giving effect to the MEC’s decision, and of the various High Court judgments leading up to and following the publication of this notice.
Conclusion: The decision by the MEC highlights the vulnerability of protected areas and the importance of the conservation of biodiversity, particularly in a context of parochial or partisan objectives and profit-vested interests that are of a
limited (at least in the medium- to long-term) public benefit. It is concluded that the discretionary clauses in NEMPAA may need to be amended to limit or refine the discretion politicians may apply.


Download data is not yet available.


Alison, L., Smith, M.D., Eastman, O. & Rainbow, L., 2003, ‘Toulmin’s philosophy of argument and its relevance to offender profiling’, Psychology, Crime & Law 9, 173–183,

Atmiş, E., 2018, ‘A critical review of the (potentially) negative impacts of current protected area policies on the nature conservation of forests in Turkey’, Land Use Policy 70, 675–684,

Blackmore, A., 2015, ‘The relationship between the NEMA and the public trust doctrine: The importance of the NEMA principles in safeguarding South Africa’s biodiversity’, South African Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 20, 89–118.

Blackmore, A., 2018, ‘The rediscovery of the trusteeship doctrine in South African environmental law and its significance in conserving biodiversity in South Africa’, (Doctoral Thesis), University of Tilburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Blackmore, A., 2020, ‘Towards unpacking the theory behind, and a pragmatic approach to biodiversity offsets’, Environmental Management 65, 88–97,

Blackmore, A., 2022, ‘Concurrent national and provincial legislative competence: rethinking the relationship between nature reserves and national parks’, Submitted: Law, Democracy and Development.

CER, 2021, ‘Centre for Environmental Rights – Statement on environmental MEC’s decision to exclude properties from the Mabola Protected Environment to enable a new coal mine’, Centre for Environmental Rights. URL: (accessed 25 June 2021).

Cook, C.N., Valkan, R.S., Mascia, M.B. & McGeoch, M.A., 2017, ‘Quantifying the extent of protected-area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement in Australia’, Conservation Biology 31, 1039–1052.

Coppa, S., Pronti, A., Massaro, G., Brundu, R., Camedda, A., Palazzo, L., Nobile, G., Pagliarino, E. & de Lucia, G.A., 2021, ‘Fishery management in a marine protected area with compliance gaps: Socio-economic and biological insights as a first step on the path of sustainability’, Journal of Environmental Management 280, 111754,

Davis, J., 2021, Mining and Environmental Justice Community Network of South Africa and Others v Uthaka Energy (PTY) Ltd (11761/2021) [2021] ZAGPPHC 195 (30 March 2021).

de Marques, A.A.B. & Peres, C.A., 2015, ‘Pervasive legal threats to protected areas in Brazil’, Oryx 49, 25–29,

De Vos, A., Clements, H.S., Biggs, D. & Cumming, G.S., 2019, ‘The dynamics of proclaimed privately protected areas in South Africa over 83 years’, Conservation Letters 12,

Goosen, M. & Blackmore, A., 2019, ‘Hitchhikers’ guide to the legal context of protected area management plans in South Africa’, Bothalia, a2399 49, 1–10, v49i1.2399.

Hoffmann, S. & Beierkuhnlein, C., 2020, ‘Climate change exposure and vulnerability of the global protected area estate from an international perspective’, Diversity and Distributions 26, 1496–1509,

Lubbe, W.J., 2019, ‘Mining in Chrissiesmeer wetland and state custodianship’ Doctoral Thesis), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

Mascia, M.B. & Pailler, S., 2011, ‘Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications: PADDD and its implications’, Conservation Letters 4, 9–20,

MEJCON Judgment, 2018, Environmental Justice Community Network of South Africa and Others v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Others [2019] 1 All SA 491 (GP) (8 November 2018).

Mogale, P.T. & Odeku, K.O., 2018, ‘Transformative tourism legislation: an impetus for socioeconomic development in South Africa’, African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure 7, 1–16.

Prato, T. & Fagre, D.B., 2020. ‘Protected Area Management’ in: Wang, Y. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Natural Resources: Land. CRC Press, New York.

Qin, S., Golden Kroner, R.E., Cook, C., Tesfaw, A.T., Braybrook, R., Rodriguez, C.M., Poelking, C. & Mascia, M.B., 2019, ‘Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement as a threat to iconic protected areas’, Conservation Biology 33, 1275–1285,

Radeloff, V.C., Stewart, S.I., Hawbaker, T.J., Gimmi, U., Pidgeon, A.M., Flather, C.H., Hammer, R.B. & Helmers, D.P., 2010, ‘Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 940–945,

RSA, 1989, Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989.

RSA, 2003, National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 57 of 2003.

SANParks, 2021, History of Vaalbos and Mokala National Park, Mokala National Park, URL: (accessed 22 June 2021).

Shongwe Notice, 2021, ‘Exclusion of part of Protected Environment (Farms Properties) As Part of an Existing Mabola Protected Environment in Terms of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 57 Of 2003 (As Amended)’ Notice 2, Provincial Gazette 3225 of 15 January 2021.

Strydom, H.A. & King, N.D. (eds), 2009, Fuggle and Rabie’s, Environmental Management in South Africa, Juta and Company Ltd. Cape Town.

Treves, A., Santiago-Ávila, F.J. & Lynn, W.S., 2019, ‘Just preservation’, Biological Conservation 229, 134–141,

Van der Schyff, E., 2010, ‘Unpacking the public trust doctrine: a journey into foreign territory’, Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 13122-159.

Watson, A., 1984, Sources of law, legal change, and ambiguity, University of Pennsylvania Press,

Zurba, M., Stucker, D., Mwaura, G., Burlando, C., Rastogi, A., Dhyani, S. & Koss, R., 2020, ‘Intergenerational dialogue, collaboration, learning, and decision-making in global environmental governance: the case of the IUCN intergenerational partnership for sustainability’, Sustainability 12, 498,




How to Cite

Blackmore, A. (2022). To be or not to be a protected area: A perverse political threat. Bothalia, African Biodiversity & Conservation, 52(1).



Original research, Reviews, Strategies, Case studies