Has strategic planning made a difference to amphibian conservation research in South Africa?

Authors

  • John Measey Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University
  • Jeanne Tarrant Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University
  • Alex Rebelo Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University; Port Elizabeth Museum
  • Andrew Turner CapeNature Scientific Services; Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape
  • Louis du Preez Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University
  • Mohlamatsane Mokhatla Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University; South African National Parks
  • Werner Conradie Port Elizabeth Museum; School of Natural Resource Management, Nelson Mandela University

Keywords:

threatened species, Red List Index, Anura, conservation research, strategy

Abstract

Background: Conservation relies on the strategic use of resources because monies for conservation action are limited, especially in developing countries. South Africa’s Frog Atlas project established a baseline for the country’s amphibian data and threat levels in 2004, and in 2009 a prioritisation exercise developed a strategy for conservation research.

Objectives: In this article, we assess this strategy for conservation research.

Method: We conducted a quantitative and qualitative assessment of research undertaken since the strategy was developed.

Results: The strategy has produced a lasting impact on taxonomy, ecological studies, monitoring and capacity building. Publications in all areas have increased, but particularly in conservation ecology. Other indicators are increases in the numbers of locality records for target taxa, species descriptions and postgraduate degrees with amphibians as the principal topic. We document important milestones for South African amphibian conservation, including the first Biodiversity Management Plan for Species (BMP-S) for Hyperolius pickersgilli, a smart device app that uploads locality data to an open access database, 15 years of monitoring data and new amphibian identification books for adults and children. The Red List Index calculated for South African amphibians shows that the country’s species are becoming more threatened (a 1% reduction in 10 years), but a hindcasting exercise suggests that most of the damage was already done by 1990. We provide a checklist for 131 amphibian species in South Africa, of which 82 species are endemic.

Conclusion: A strategy for conservation research was found to greatly augment the focus of research on South African frogs. A new strategy should focus on fewer taxa over meaningful time spans.

Author Biographies

John Measey, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University

Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch,
South Africa

Jeanne Tarrant, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University

Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Alex Rebelo, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University; Port Elizabeth Museum

Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch,
South Africa

Port Elizabeth Museum, Humewood, South Africa

Andrew Turner, CapeNature Scientific Services; Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape

CapeNature Scientific Services, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town,
South Africa

Louis du Preez, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University

Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Mohlamatsane Mokhatla, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University; South African National Parks

Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch,
South Africa

Rondevlei Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Sedgefield, South Africa

Werner Conradie, Port Elizabeth Museum; School of Natural Resource Management, Nelson Mandela University

Port Elizabeth Museum, Humewood, South Africa

School of Natural Resource Management, Nelson Mandela University, George, South Africa

Published

2019-09-25

How to Cite

Measey, J. ., Tarrant, J. ., Rebelo, A. ., Turner, A. ., du Preez, L. ., Mokhatla, M. ., & Conradie, W. . (2019). Has strategic planning made a difference to amphibian conservation research in South Africa?. Bothalia, African Biodiversity & Conservation, 49(1). Retrieved from https://abcjournal.org/index.php/BothaliaABC/article/view/34

Issue

Section

Original research, Reviews, Strategies, Case studies