Search this journal:     Advanced search
Original Research

Scientific assessments: Matching the process to the problem

Robert J. Scholes, Gregory O. Schreiner, Luanita Snyman-Van der Walt

Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation; Vol 47, No 2 (2017), 9 pages. doi: 10.4102/abc.v47i2.2144

Submitted: 03 August 2016
Published:  31 March 2017


Background: The science–policy interface process – known as a ‘scientific assessment’ – has risen to prominence in the past few decades. Complex assessments are appropriate for issues which are both technically complicated, multifaceted and of high societal interest. There is increasing interest from the research community that studies biological invasions to undertake such an assessment.
Objectives: Providing the relevant background and context, the article describes key principles and steps for designing, planning, resourcing and executing such a process, as well as providing evidence of high-impact assessments enhancing scientific careers.
Method: Experience from international and national assessments, most recently the South African scientific assessment for the Shale Gas Development in the Central Karoo, was used to develop this guiding generic template for practitioners. Analyses of researcher publication performances were undertaken to determine the benefit of being involved in assessments.
Results: The key success factors for assessments mostly relate to adherence to ‘process’ and ‘governance’ aspects, for which scientists are sometimes ill-equipped. As regards publication outputs, authors involved in assessment processes demonstrated higher H-indices than their environmental scientist peers. We have suggested causal explanations for this.
Conclusion: Effectively designed and managed assessments provide the platform for the ‘co-production of knowledge’ – an iterative and collaborative process involving scientists, stakeholders and policymakers. This increases scientific impact in the society–policy domain. While scientists seem concerned that effort directed towards assessments comes at the detriment of scientific credibility and productivity, we have presented data that suggest the opposite.

Full Text:  |  HTML  |  EPUB  |  XML  |  PDF (1MB)

Author affiliations

Robert J. Scholes, Global Change and Sustainability Research Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Gregory O. Schreiner, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, South Africa
Luanita Snyman-Van der Walt, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, South Africa


Assessment; science-policy interface


Total abstract views: 330
Total article views: 894  


1. Contributions to the National Status Report on Biological Invasions in South Africa
John R.U. Wilson, Mirijam Gaertner, David M. Richardson, Brian W. Van Wilgen
Bothalia  vol: 47  issue: 2  year: 2017  
doi: 10.4102/abc.v47i2.2207

Comments on this article

Before posting your comment, please read our policy.
Post a Comment (Login required)

ISSN: 0006-8241 (print) | ISSN: 2311-9284 (online)

Connect on: Facebook, Twitter, Google+, LinkedIn and YouTube

Subscribe to our newsletter

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.

Website design & content: ©2017 AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved. No unauthorised duplication allowed.

AOSIS Publishing | Empowering Africa through access to knowledge
Postnet Suite #110, Private Bag X19, Durbanville, South Africa, 7551
Tel: 086 1000 381
Tel: +27 21 975 2602
Fax: 086 5004 974

publishing(AT) replace (AT) with @

Please read the privacy statement.